NEW DELHI: No sooner had the Union Cabinet cleared an ordinance to sharpen laws on sexual assault than some women activists questioned the "unseemly haste" in promulgating an ordinance when Parliament is convening only 20 days later. A bipartisan sanction to tougher laws against sex crimes, they said, would carry greater force. Some of them went so far as to say that they would urge the President to not sign the ordinance.
Additional solicitor general, Indira Jaising felt that ordinances should be brought only in an emergency situation that brooked no delay. In this instance there was no such pressing emergency. In fact, greater deliberation would only help to enact a set of stronger — and if need be, more nuanced — laws.
The non-inclusion of marital rape as a crime, even in the period leading up to separation, has come in for sharp criticism from activists.
Jaising said she was disappointed that the Cabinet had not waived government sanction for police to take up cases of rape by armed forces personnel. "While this need for sanction is understandable in the case of encounter deaths, as that might have happened in the course of duty, how can rape be committed in the course of duty?" she said.
Ordinance on sexual crimes: Women activists angry, criticize ‘key’ omissions
This article
Ordinance on sexual crimes: Women activists angry, criticize ‘key’ omissions
can be opened in url
http://newsingluvies.blogspot.com/2013/02/ordinance-on-sexual-crimes-women.html
Ordinance on sexual crimes: Women activists angry, criticize ‘key’ omissions
